Global Human Rights Defence

Intolerance towards the right of Muslims to practice freedom of religion in Sri Lanka
Photo: Women wearing burqa wait in line for Covid-19 test in Colombo, Sri Lanka on 4 May 2020. Source: Lakruwan Wannirachchi/ AFP/ Scroll.in

Author: Sarah Thanawala, GHRD, October 2021

INTRODUCTION

On 13 March 2021, a proposal was put forth by the Minister of Public Security, Sarath Weerasekara, to the Cabinet of Ministers to ban face covers or burqas worn by Muslim women in public, as well as to shut down more than a thousand Islamic schools called madrassas (The Guardian, 2021). The proposal was made as a ministerial statement on the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Report on the Easter Sunday attacks (Chaudhary, 2021). Weerasekara quoted national security and religious extremism as reasons for seeking the cabinet’s approval (The Guardian, 2021). On 27 April 2021, the cabinet approved the proposed ban (Aljazeera, 2021). This legislative proposal follows the Emergency Regulations that banned burqas in public in response to the Easter Sunday attacks in 2019 (Reuters, 2019). 

On 28 April 2021, Weerasakara highlighted the decision of the cabinet in his Twitter account (Weerasakara, 2021).

On 21 April 2019, a series of deadly attacks were carried out on Easter Sunday, predominantly targeting the Christian community. The blasts that killed hundreds of civilians were carried out by a Sri Lankan Islamist terrorist group, National Thowheeth Jama’ath, affiliated to Islamist State (ISIS) (UK Home Office, 2021). The attacks exacerbated and legalized arbitrary actions by the State as well as the society against the Sri Lankan Muslims. 

As per the current situation of the proposal, in order to be passed as legislation, the proposal will be sent to the Attorney General’s Department, where it waits to be approved by the Parliament (Mallawarachi, 2021). Since the Rajapaksa government holds the majority in the Parliament, the approved proposal stands a high probability to be passed as a law (Mallawarachi, 2021). The ban fundamentally restricts the rights of the minority community in their practice of religion without sufficient proof that such a ban would be beneficial from a national security perspective. More importantly, it directly discriminates against Muslim women as it severely restricts their right to express their beliefs or religion through face veils. As observed by various international human rights organizations, such a ban also restricts Muslim women to their homes and away from public spaces, which instigates more harm than the vague and ambiguous counter-terrorism measure of the Government by banning burqas (Amnesty International, 2020). 

CONTEXT: ATROCITIES AGAINST THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY 

While Buddhism accounts for the majority religion in Sri Lanka, the population consists of several minority groups, with 9.7% representing the Muslim community (UK Home Office, 2021). The ban on burqas and madrassas can further be contextualized by factoring in other societal discriminations and state-inflicted atrocities against Muslims. Following are some of the events that mark the marginalization of Muslims in Sri Lanka. 

Atrocities under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), 1978

The PTA was enacted as a temporary measure in 1978 and has since been in force in Sri Lanka (DeVotta, 2021). Since its implementation, Sri Lanka has faced increasing scrutiny from the international community on account of the rampant human rights violations due to the discriminatory provisions of the PTA (European Parliament, 2021). The Act provides vague definitions of what can be considered an ‘offence’andfacilitates arbitrary arrests, detentions, and torture. Under the guise of counter-terrorism legislation like the PTA, the minority communities, including Muslims, have been especially disproportionately targeted. Disturbingly, on 12 March 2021, new de-radicalization regulations to the PTA were issued that sought to further exacerbate the arbitrary provisions by sending suspects for rehabilitation without any legal remedy and allowing arrests without any evidential proof (DeVotta, 2021).  In April 2020, Hejaaz Hizbullah, a prominent human rights activist and lawyer, was arrested under the PTA and detained without any charges (Siddiqui, 2021). Hizbullah and many other such activists detained over time paint a grim picture of abuse under the PTA.

Societal discriminations (Anti-Muslim violence)

As a Minority community in Sri Lanka, Muslims have faced discrimination and marginalization throughout Sri Lankan history. Anti-Muslim violence has been a factor that has scarred the Muslim community from freely practising their religion (UK Home Office, 2021). The 2019 Easter bombings have caused a disturbing rise in societal discrimination against Muslims – such as “physical attacks on Muslims, a boycott of Muslim businesses, harassment on public transport, and hate campaigns…” (UK Home Office, 2021).

Crematorium discriminations during COVID-19

While the entire world was gripping under the COVID-19 pandemic, the Sri Lankan Government aggravated the grief of the families of COVID-19 victims by disallowing the last burial rites (BBC, 2021). In early 2020, the Government’s rule of cremations of COVID-19 deaths led to deeply hurting sentiments of the Muslim community (BBC, 2021). Disturbingly, the guidelines were enforced despite the World Health Organization allowing both burials and cremations (WHO; Amnesty International 2021). The cremation guidelines remained in force for a year, only to be lifted on 25 February 2021 (BBC, 2021).

 SRI LANKA’S DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS

The Constitution of Sri Lanka protects the rights of minorities. It specifically protects the right to practice religion under its Article 9 (affirms duty to ensure all religions are granted rights), Article 10 (freedom of religion), Article 12 (right to equality) and Article 14(1)(e) (“freedom .. either in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching”) (The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, 1978).

State-sanctioned restrictions on the freedom to practise religion, including the freedom to wear a burqa in public or run madrassas, is in contravention of Sri Lanka’s obligations towards International legal frameworks. The freedom to practice religion is protected by fundamental human rights treaties such as article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – considered to be customary international law – obligating every State to respect its protections and preventions. Furthermore, article 18 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects the freedom of religion to be practised in public or private. Article 18(4) of ICCPR further protects the right of parents to ensure the religious education of their children. In addition, the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), under its Article 13(3), protects the right of parents to ensure religious and moral education of children. 

Paragraph 4 of the Human Rights Committee, general comment 22, particularly states that “The observance and practice of religion or belief may include not only ceremonial acts but also such customs as the observations of dietary regulations, the wearing of distinctive clothing or head cover…” (OHCHR). The general comment further reiterated the right to teach, as well as to establish schools and distribute religious texts and beliefs (OHCHR). The proposal was accepted by the cabinet despite the UN expert expressing concerns that the ban would clearly stand in violation of international law (Mallawarachi, 2021). In the UN Report, the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, on his last visit to Sri Lanka in August 2019, observed that “religious minorities also face restrictions in the manifestation of their religion or belief” (United Nations, 2020). 

Sri Lanka has ratified both the ICCPR and the ICESCR, and is under an obligation to ensure to protect the right to religious freedom under its Constitution. 

CONCLUSION 

The social and legal atrocities against Muslims clearly signifies that the minority community is unfairly targeted solely based on religion. Ban of burqas and shutting down of madrassas is the most recent example of Sri Lanka’s blatant denial of the community’s right to establish and run religious institutions and the rights of Muslim women to express their religious identity through face veils. While the ban still awaits to be passed by the Parliament, the international actors, such as the      UNHCR, must take urgent actions in ensuring that the ban is shelved before it is presented to be legislation. The immediacy on the part of the international community is especially potent considering Sri Lanka’s active, state-sanctioned discrimination through its domestic laws and absolute lack of accountability in protecting the interests of Sri Lankan Muslims. 

REFERENCES

News Articles:

Aljazeera (2021, April 28). Sri Lanka cabinet approves proposed ban on burqas in public. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/28/sri-lanka-cabinet-approves-proposed-ban-on-burqas-in-public, accessed 18 October, 2021.  

Amnesty International (2021, March 19). Sri Lanka: Increased marginalization, Discrimination and targeting Sri Lanka’s Muslim community. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa37/3866/2021/en/, accessed 17 October, 2021

Amnesty International (2020, June 8). Eliminating Tolerance and Discrimination based on Religion or Belief and the Achievment of Sustainable Development Goal 16 in Sri Lanka. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa37/2487/2020/en/ , accessed 17 October, 2021

BBC (2021, February 26). Covid-19: Sri Lanka reverses ‘anti-muslim’ cremation order. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56205737 , accessed 23 October, 2021

Chaudhury, D. (2021, March 13). Sri Lanka mulls madrasa ban, wearing burqa. Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/sri-lanka-to-ban-burqa-shut-many-islamic-schools-minister-for-public-security-says/articleshow/81482928.cms?from=mdr, accessed 17 October, 2021

European Parliament 2019-2024 (2021, June 8). Plenary sitting: Motion for a resolution. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2021-0356_EN.pdf 

Mallawarachi, B (2021, April 27). Sri Lankan cabinet approved proposed ban in burqas in public. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/asia-pacific-religion-sri-lanka-51deeb417aefac87802917993825d9a6, accessed 27 October, 2021

  Sirilal, R. and Pal, A. (2019, April 29). Sri Lanka bans face veils fter attacks by Islamist militants. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sri-lanka-blasts-burqa/sri-lanka-bans-face-veils-after-attacks-by-islamist-militants-idUSKCN1S50JG,  accessed 17 October, 2021

Siddiqui, U. (2021, October 15). Why Sri Lanka Jailed a Muslim Lawyer without Charge for 6 Months. Aljazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/15/sri-lanka-muslim-lawyer, accessed 23 October, 2021

      The Guardian (2021, March 13). Sri Lanka to ban burqa and close 1,000 Islamic schools https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/13/sri-lanka-to-ban-burka-and-close-1000-islamic-schools, accessed 17 October, 2021

Journal Articles:

DeVotta, N. (2021, June 14). [ADERN Issue Briefing] Sri Lanka’s Prevention of Terrorism Act: An Anti-Minority Cudgel. Asia Democracy Research Institute & East Asia Institute. http://www.adrnresearch.org/publications/list.php, accessed 17 October, 2021

UK Home Office (2021, August). Country Police and Information Note: Sri Lanka – Religious Minorities. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sri-lanka-country-policy-and-information-notes

International Publications:

OHCHR. International standards on freedom of religion or belief. https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/freedomreligion/pages/standards.aspx

United Nations (2020, August 25). Report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief (A/HRC/43/48/Add.2) . https://undocs.org/A/HRC/43/48/Add.2 

World Health Organization. Water sanitation hygiene, Disposal of dead bodies in emergency conditions. www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/tech_note8/en/index1.html 

Domestic Legislation:

The Constituion of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, 1978. (as amended on 29th     October 2020, Revised Edn 2021) https://www.parliament.lk/files/pdf/constitution.pdf

Others:

 Weerasakara, S. [@ReAdSarath]. (2021, April 8). Cabinet apprvl was granted prohibiting covering of “Full Face” in Public w/ reservations where certain parts of the face needs to be covered as specified by Quarantine Law & Health regulations. Twitter. https://twitter.com/ReAdSarath/status/1387280348271104001?s=20 

POPULAR POSTS

Subscribe to our Newsletter

FOLLOW US

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Kenza Mena
Team Coordinator -China

Kenza Mena has expertise in international criminal law since she is currently pursuing a last-year Master’s degree in International Criminal Justice at Paris II Panthéon-Assas and obtained with honors cum laude an LLM in International and Transnational Criminal Law from the University of Amsterdam. She also holds a Bachelor’s degree in French and Anglo-American law. 

Since September 2021, she has been the coordinator of Team China at GHRD, a country where violations of human rights, even international crimes, are frequently perpetrated by representatives of the State. Within Team China, awareness is also raised on discrimination that Chinese women and minorities in the country and, more generally, Chinese people around the world are facing.

Kenza believes that the primary key step to tackle atrocities perpetrated around the world is advocacy and promotion of human rights.

Aimilina Sarafi
Pakistan Coordinator

Aimilina Sarafi holds a Bachelor’s degree cum laude in International Relations and Organisations from Leiden University and is currently pursuing a Double Legal Master’s degree (LLM) in Public International Law and International Criminal Law at the University of Amsterdam.
She is an active advocate for the human rights of all peoples in her community and is passionate about creating a better world for future generations. Aimilina is the coordinator for the GHRD team of Pakistan, in which human rights violations of minority communities in Pakistan are investigated and legally evaluated based on international human rights legal standards.
Her team is working on raising awareness on the plight of minority communities such as women, children, religious and ethnic minorities within Pakistan.

Lukas Mitidieri
Coordinator & Head Researcher- Bangladesh

Lucas Mitidieri is currently pursuing his bachelor’s degree in International Relations at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). As the GHRD Bangladesh Team Coordinator, he advocates for human rights and monitors violations across all minorities and marginalized groups in Bangladesh. Lucas believes that the fight for International Human Rights is the key to a world with better social justice and greater equality.

Nicole Hutchinson
Editorial Team Lead

Nicole has an MSc in International Development Studies with a focus on migration. She is passionate about promoting human rights and fighting poverty through advocacy and empowering human choice. Nicole believes that even the simplest social justice efforts, when properly nurtured, can bring about radical and positive change worldwide.

Gabriela Johannen
Coordinator & Head Researcher – India

Gabriela Johannen is a lawyer admitted to the German bar and holds extensive knowledge in the fields of human rights, refugee law, and international law. After working for various courts and law firms in her home country, she decided to obtain an LL.M. degree from Utrecht University where she studied Public International Law with a special focus on Human Rights. Additionally, while working as a pro-bono legal advisor for refugees, she expanded her knowledge in the fields of refugee law and migration.

Gabriela is the coordinator and head researcher for GHRD India, a country, she has had a personal connection with since childhood. Her primary focus is to raise awareness for the severe human rights violations against minorities and marginalized groups that continue to occur on a daily basis in India. By emphasizing the happenings and educating the general public, she hopes to create a better world for future generations.

João Victor
Coordinator & Head Researcher – International Justice

João Victor is a young Brazilian lawyer who leads our team of International Justice and Human Rights. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Law from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and possesses over 5 years of experience in dealing with Human Rights and International Law issues both in Brazil and internationally, including the protection of refugees’ rights and the strengthening of accountability measures against torture crimes.

João has an extensive research engagement with subjects related to International Justice in general, and more specifically with the study of the jurisprudence of Human Rights Courts regarding the rise of populist and anti-terrorist measures taken by national governments. He is also interested in the different impacts that new technologies may provoke on the maintenance of Human Rights online, and how enforcing the due diligence rules among private technology companies might secure these rights against gross Human Rights violations.

Célinne Bodinger
Environment and Human Rights Coordinator

As the Environment and Human Rights Coordinator, Célinne is passionate about the health of our planet and every life on it.

Angela Roncetti
Team Coordinator and Head Researcher- South America

Angela holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B) from Vitória Law School (FDV) in Brazil. Her research combines more than five years of experience conducting debates and studies on the rights of homeless people, the elderly, children, and refugees. Besides that, she also volunteers in a social project called Sou Diferente (I am Different in English), where she coordinates and takes part in actions aimed at the assistance and the emancipation of vulnerable groups in the cities of the metropolitan area of Espírito Santo state (Brazil).

Lina Borchardt
Team Head (Promotions)
(Europe)

She is currently heading the Promotions Team and University Chapter of Global Human Rights Defence. Her background is the one of European and International Law, which I am studying in The Hague. She has previously gained experience at Women´s Rights organizations in Germany, the Netherlands and Turkey over the past years.
She has been working for Global Human Rights Defence in the Netherlands since 2020. Her focus now is concentrated on the Human Rights and Minorities Film Festival and the cooperation of GHRD with students across the country.

Pedro Ivo Oliveira
Team Coordinator and Researcher
(Africa)

Pedro holds an extensive background in Human Rights, especially in Global Health, LGBTQ+ issues, and HIV and AIDS. He is currently finishing his Bachelor’s Degree in International Relations and Affairs at the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Moreover, he successfully attended the Bilingual Summer School in Human Rights Education promoted by the Federal University of Minas Gerais and the Association of Universities of the Montevideo Group. Besides, Pedro Ivo has a diversified professional background, collecting experiences in many NGOs and projects.

With outstanding leadership abilities, in 2021, Pedro Ivo was the Secretary-General of the 22nd edition of the biggest UN Model in Latin America: the MINIONU. Fluent in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, Pedro Ivo is the Team Coordinator and Head Researcher of the Team Africa at Global Human Rights Defence. Hence, his focus is to empower his team from many parts of the world about the Human Rights Situation in the African continent, meanwhile having a humanized approach.

Alessandro Cosmo
GHRD Youth Ambassador
(European Union)

Alessandro Cosmo obtained his B.A. with Honors from Leiden University College where he studied International Law with a minor in Social and Business Entrepreneurship. He is currently pursuing an LL.M. in Public International Law at Utrecht University with a specialization in Conflict and Security. 
As GHRD’s E.U. Youth Ambassador, Alessandro’s two main focuses are to broaden the Defence’s reach within E.U. institutions and political parties, as well as mediate relations between human rights organizations abroad seeking European funding. 
Alessandro believes that human rights advocacy requires grass-roots initiatives where victims’ voices are amplified and not paraphrased or spoken for. He will therefore act on this agenda when representing Global Human Rights Defence domestically and abroad

Veronica Delgado
Team Coordinator and Researcher- Japan, Sri Lanka & Tibet

Veronica is a Colombian lawyer who leads our team of Japan, Sri Lanka and Tibet. She holds a master’s degree in Public International Law from Utrecht University. She has experience in Colombian law firms. Here she represented clients before constitutional courts. She also outlined legal concepts to state entities such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ombudsman’s Office on international law issues.

Veronica has an extensive research background with subjects related to public international law. She worked as an assistant researcher for more than two years for the Externado University of Colombia. Here she undertook in-depth research on constitutional, business, and human rights law issues. She was involved with consultancy services with the Colombian Army regarding transitional justice. 

Wiktoria Walczyk
Coordinator & Head Researcher (Nepal & Indonesia)

Wiktoria Walczyk has joined GHRD in June 2020 as a legal intern. She is currently coordinator and head researcher of Team Nepal and Indonesia. She has an extensive legal knowledge concerning international human rights and is passionate about children’s and minorities’ rights. Wiktoria has obtained her LL.B. in International & European Law and she specialised in Public International Law & Human Rights at The Hague University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands. Moreover, she is pursuing her LL.M. in International & European Law and focusing on Modern Human Rights Law specialisation at the University of Wroclaw in Poland. In order to gain an essential legal experience, Wiktoria has also joined Credit Suisse’s 2021 General Counsel Graduate First Program where she is conducting her legal training and discovering the banking world. She would like to make a significant impact when it comes to the protection of fundamental human rights around the world, especially with regard to child labour. 

Fairuz Sewbaks
Coordinator and Head Researcher
(Africa)​

Fairuz Sewbaks holds extensive legal knowledge regarding international human rights, with a specific focus on human rights dealings taking place in continental Africa. She holds a bachelor’s degree from The Hague University in public international law and international human rights and successfully followed advanced human rights courses at the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria. She furthermore participated in the Istanbul Summer School where she was educated about the role of epidemics and pandemics in light of human rights.

 

Fairuz is the coordinator and head researcher for GHRD Africa. Her primary focus is to establish and coordinate long-term research projects regarding the differentiating human rights dealings of vulnerable and marginalized groups in continental Africa, as well as conducting individual research projects.

Priya Lachmansingh
Coordinator and Head Researcher, Political Advisor
(Asia & America)

Priya Lachmansingh is currently pursuing her bachelor’s degree in International & European
Law at the Hague University of Applied Science.
As GHRD’s Asia & America human rights coordinator and GHRD Political Advisor, Priya’s
prominent focus is to highlight human rights violations targeted against minority and
marginalized groups in Asia and America and to broaden GHRD reach within Dutch political
parties and as well seek domestic funding.

Jasmann Chatwal
Team Coordinator & Head Coordinator: North America

Jasmann is a political science student at Leiden University who joined GHRD in May 2021 as an intern in team Pakistan. Now, she is the team coordinator for North America and is responsible for coordinating the documentation of human rights violations in USA, Canada, and America.